“CHINA PLUS ONE” MODEL IN MODERN CONDITIONS OF GLOBAL UNCERTAINTY: THE CASE OF CHINA – VIETNAM COOPETION

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  L. Galperina

  D. Kolechko

  O. Umanskyi

Abstract

The “China plus one” model was updated after 2009 due to domestic factors, and after 2018 – due to global factors. The following are identified as the main internal reasons for the implementation of the “China plus one” model: the increase in the cost of production due to the increase in labor costs, social protection of the population and increased environmental requirements; institutional specificity; selectivity of granting benefits; imperfection of judicial protection; violation of intellectual property rights; prejudice of the population towards companies of certain jurisdictions as a cause of danger and decrease of demand in the domestic market. The main global factors that determine the diversification of economic activity by moving certain links in global production and sales chains outside the borders of the China include: the trade war between the USA and China; the Covid-19 pandemic; further slowdown in China’s economic growth; policy of global leaders to reduce dependence on China, sign new transregional agreements. The main advantages and disadvantages of transferring links of production and sales chains to Vietnam are considered. The main advantages include: a common land and sea border between the two countries, which significantly reduces the logistical and cost burden; modern infrastructure; macroeconomic and political stability, stock market, not a high level of payment for skilled labor; high rates of economic growth. Vietnam has demonstrated a flexible and effective response to the uncertainties of the global business environment. Disadvantages include the presence of territorial disputes and regional competition between countries. As a result of the involvement of Vietnam in the “China plus one” model, the restructuring of bilateral trade took place through the multiple growth of Vietnamese hightech exports to China, foreign investments increased, which contributed to the economic growth of Vietnam. Using the example of Vietnam, it is substantiated that all participants in the China plus one model benefit: international companies that diversify risks, China and Vietnam.

How to Cite

Galperina, L., Kolechko, D., & Umanskyi, O. (2022). “CHINA PLUS ONE” MODEL IN MODERN CONDITIONS OF GLOBAL UNCERTAINTY: THE CASE OF CHINA – VIETNAM COOPETION. Chinese Studies, (2), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.51198/chinesest2022.02.054
Article views: 294 | PDF Downloads: 179

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

globalization, coopetition, trade war, risks, uncertainty, China, Vietnam.

References
Chen, Y. AsiaPacific Regional Economic Integration: Coopetition vs. Conflict. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal, 2016. 2(1), 141–171.
Enderwick, P. A ‘China-Plus-One’ strategy: The best of both worlds? Human Systems Management, 2011. 30(1–2), 85–96.
Fang, H., and Yeung, B. Post-COVID-19 reconfiguration of the global value chains and China. In Impact of COVID-19 on Asian economies and policy responses, 2020, pp. 151–156.
He, S., and Wang, X. Rebuilding Chinese International Business during and post-COVID-19. In COVID-19 and International Business, 2020, pp. 321–329.
Routledge. Major Milestones. Website of the Vin Fast auto, available at: https://vinfastauto.us/ story (accessed 26 May 2022).
Rahaman, M.T., Pranta, A.D., Chandrow, O., Das, N.C., Khatun, M.D., Arafat, M.Y., and Sami, W.B.B. COVID-19 Pandemic and the Future of China-Plus-One Strategy in Apparel Trade: A Critical Analysis from Bangladesh-Vietnam Point of View. Open Journal of Business and Management, 2021. 9(5), 2183–2196. Report on foreign direct investment in the first 4 months of 2021, available at: https://www.mpi.gov.vn/en/Pages/tinbai.aspx?idTin=49901&idcm=122 (accessed 26 May 2022).
Vrushi J. Global Corruption Barometer. Asia 2020. Citizens’ views and experiences of corruption. Transparency International the global coalition against corruption. 2020. 60 p.
Website International Trade Centre UNCTAD/WTO (ITC), available at: https://www.trademap.org Website of the “Hệ thống tìm kiếm & tra cứu hiệu lực Văn bản pháp luật”. 2018, available at: https://vanbanphapluat.co/ Website of the World Bank. 2022, available at: https://data.worldbank.org/ country/vietnam (accessed 26 May 2022).
Witchell S. and Symington P. China plus one. FTI Journal. 2013. 1–6.
Вебсайт уряду Японії. 2022, available at: https://www.cao.go.jp/ (accessed 26 May 2022).
Колечко Д.В. Економічна стратегія В’єтнаму в новій архітектоніці глобальних економічних відносин. Кваліфікаційна наукова праця на правах рукопису. КНЕУ, Київ. 2021.
Родіонова Т.А. і Масюк О.Є. Структура і динаміка потоків капіталу між США, Китаєм та Європейським Союзом. Китаєзнавчі дослідження, 2021. 2, с. 80–92. Родіонова Т.А., Якубовський С.О. і Кочарян В.Г. Стан ринку праці та міграційні процеси в Китайській Народній Республіці. Китаєзнавчі дослідження, 2021. 1, с. 124–136.
中国制造2025. 2015, available at: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/ content/2015-05/19/content_9784.html