PORT EXPANSION OF CHINA – LESSONS FOR UKRAINE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The paper investigates the development of domestic and foreign seaports in conditions of growth of global competition, expansion, implementation of aggressive policies and strategies by competitors. Terminal business always, especially now offers a faster and more guaranteed return of funds, greater return on invested capital. Currently, China owns port terminals in 34 countries and plans to purchase port terminals in 8 countries in the next 2–3 years. So China is going to become a leading maritime power, like England in the 19th century. In the course of the study, scientific and analytical works, strategies for the development of seaports in China and other countries were studied. The methodology of constructing competitive maps of the global port market, systematization of factors and generalization of modern methods for studying the patterns and features of the development of seaports were used. The analysis of competitive map revealed significant asymmetries in dynamics and size of market shares of countries in the world port market, which is the result of the implementation of unique national, regional and local strategies. On the example of China, we observe the key drivers of their development – the active use of public-private partnerships, scientific, educational and technological factors.
How to Cite
Ilnytskyy, D., & Zinchenko, S. (2021). PORT EXPANSION OF CHINA – LESSONS FOR UKRAINE. Chinese Studies, (1), 36-57. Retrieved from https://chinese-studies.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/116
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
transport infrastructure, world port market, competitive map, economic effect, expansion, investments
References
Гапочка A. А. Международные морские порты-хабы как фактор развития региона Балтийского моря. Санкт-Петербург, 2017. – URL: https://disser.spbu.ru/files/disser2/disser/1WXZVyzNrc.pdf (дата обращения: 1.08.2018).
Зинченко С. Г. Контроллинг эксплуатации и ремонта объектов транспортно-технологической системы морского порта в условиях дерегуляции перевозки грузов и наличия суброгацийного оборудования. Мариуполь: ООО “ППНС”, 2017.
Ільницький Д. О., Зінченко С. Г. Пошук ідеальної моделі транспортно-технологічної системи порту: компетентнісний вимір // Вісник Одеського національного університету: серія “Економіка”, 2017. Т. 22. Вип. 5 (58). С. 87–97.
Клепиков В. П. Логистическая инфраструктура Азовского морского региона в новых условиях // Логистика и управление цепями поставок, 2016. № 1. С. 69–79.
Кузнецов А. Л. Генезис моделей развития портов в современной транспортной науке // Вестник государственного университета морского и речного флота им. адмирала Макарова, 2015. № 2 (30). С. 141–153.
Муравский А. Военно-торговая логистика: Китай увеличил инвестиции в иностранные порты. – URL: https://ports.com.ua/articles/voenno-torgovaya-logistika-kitay-uvelichil-investitsii-v-inostrannye-porty (дата обращения: 6.08.2018).
Наукометрическая база ScienceDirect. – Режим доступа: www.sciencedirect.com (дата обращения:18.03.2018).
Носков А. Портовая инфраструктура стран Северной Африки и ее влияние на интеграцию в Средиземноморье // Азия и Африка сегодня, 2017. № 5. С. 21–25.
Официальный сайт государственного предприятия “Администрация морских портов Украины” / Раздел “Показатели работы”. – Режим доступа: http://uspa.gov.ua/ru/pokazateli-raboty
Сайт компании “Центр финансово-транспортных стратегий” / Китайские компании за последний год объявили о 20 млрд долл. инвестиций в зарубежные порты / Раздел “Новости”, 9.10.2017. – Режим доступа: https://cfts.org.ua/news/2017/10/09/kitayskie_kompanii_ za_posledniy_god_obyyavili_o_20_mlrd_dollarov_investitsiy_v_zarubezhnye_porty_43348 (дата обращения: 6.08.2018).
Финансовая отчетность. Администрация морских портов Украины. – URL: http://www.uspa.gov.ua/ru/finansovaya-otchetnost (дата обращения: 29.04.2018).
Ambrosino D. Location of mid-range dry ports in multimodal logistic networks // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences: AIRO Winter 2013/2014. № 108. Pp. 118–128.
An in-house university with its sights set on the future // CMA CGM Magazine, Winter 2017/2018. – URL: https://www.cma-cgm.com/media/magazine-article/26/the-experts-cma-cgm-academy-an-in-house-university-with-its-sights-set-on-the-future (дата обращения: 30.04.2018).
Awad-Núñeza S. Application of a model based on the use of DELPHI methodology and Multicriteria Analysis for the assessment of the quality of the Spanish Dry Ports location // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences: XVIII Congreso Panamericano de Ingeniería de Tránsito, Transporte y Logística, 2014. № 162. Pp. 42–50.
Bagočius V. Multi-Criteria Selection of a Deep-Water Port in Klaipeda // Procedia Engineering, 2013. № 57. Pp. 144–148.
Chan S. The Belt and Road Initiative: Implications for China and East Asian Economies // The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 2018, № 35(2). С. 52–78.
Chen S-L. Malaysian Container Seaport-Hinterland Connectivity: Status, Challenges and Strategies // The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2016. № 32 (3). Pp. 127–137.
Chen Yougang, Matzinger Stefan, Woetzel Jonathan. Chinese infrastructure: The big picture. McKinsey Quarterly. June 2013. – URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/winning-in-emerging-markets/chinese-infrastructure-thebig-picture (дата обращения: 30.07.2018).
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report June 30, 2017 and 2016. Port оf Los Angeles. – URL: https://www.portoflosangeles.org/Publications/ Annual_Financial_Report_FY_2016-17.pdf (дата обращения: 30.04.2018).
Container shipping: The next 50 years // Travel, Transport & Logistics, October 2017. – URL: https://www.safety4sea.com/ wp-content/uploads/2017/10/McKinsey-Container-shipping-The-next-50-years-2017_10.pdf (дата обращения: 30.04.2018).
Dong-Jin Kim. A comparison of efficiency with productivity criteria for European container ports // The Asian journal of shipping and logistics, August 2012. Volume 28, Number 2. Pp. 183–202.
Esmer S. A simulation for optimum terminal truck number in a Turkish port based on lean and green concept / Soner Esmer, Ismail Bilge Cetin, Okan Tuna // The Asian journal of shipping and logistics, December 2010. Volume 26, Number 2. Pp. 277–296.
Exports of goods and services. Worldbank Statistics database. World Bank Group. – URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS (дата обращения: 27.04.2018).
Galvao C. B. Public-Private Interests and Conflicts in Ports: A Content Analysis Approach // The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2016. № 32 (1). Pp. 013–022.
Gianfranco F. Port Cooperation Policies in the Mediterranean Basin: an Experimental Approach using Cluster Analysis // Transportation Research Procedia, 2014. № 3. Pp. 700–709.
Gogas M. Assessing the performance of intermodal city logistics terminals in Thessaloniki // Transportation Research Procedia: 3rd Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility, 26–27 May 2016, Volos, Greece. 2017. № 24. Pp. 17–24.
Hamzah S. Private involvement in sustainable management of Indonesian port: Need and strategy with PPP scheme // Procedia Environmental Sciences: 4th International Conference on Sustainable Future for Human Security, 2014. № 20. Pp.187–196.
Hanaoka S. Promoting intermodal freight transport through the development of dry ports in Asia: An environmental perspective // IATSS Research, 2011. № 35. Рp. 16–23.
Jeevan J. Preparation of dry ports for a competitive environment in the container seaport system: A process benchmarking approach // International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 2017. № 7. Pp. 019–033.
Jeon J. W. SNA Approach for Analyzing the Research Trend of International Port Competition // The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2016. № 32 (3). Pp. 165–172.
Lagoudis I. Port Investment Strategies under Uncertainty: The Case of a Southeast Asian Multipurpose Port // The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, December 2014. Volume 30, Number 3. Pp. 299–319.
Li J. Cooperation performance evaluation between seaport and dry port; case of Qingdao port and Xi’an port // International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 2014. № 1. Pp. 99–109.
Libardo A., Parolin A. Multicriteria analysis evaluating Venice port development // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012. № 48. Pp. 2545–2554.
Merchandise: Total trade and share, annual. UNCTAD. – URL: http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=92 (дата обращения: 26.04.2018).
Notteboom T. Port governance in China since 2004: Institutional layering and the growing impact of broader policies // Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2017. № 22. Pp. 184–200.
Olba X. B. Simulating the port wet infrastructure: review and assessment // Transportation Research Procedia: 18th Euro Working Group on Transportation, 2015. № 10. Pp. 683–693.
Ports strategy and logistics challenges: What are the levers for long term vitality? – TDIE Research Council / by Antoine Frémont, Claude Gressier and Pierre Van Cornewal. – URL: http://tdie.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Ports-strategy-andlogistics-challenges-TDIE-report-Oct.-2016.pdf. (дата обращения: 25.04.2018).
Readiness for the Future of Production Report 2018 (Martin C., Aurik J. etc.).
World Economic Forum, 2018. – URL: http://www3.weforum.org/ docs/FOP_Readiness_Report_2018.pdf (дата обращения: 28.04.2018).
Review of Maritime Transport 2017 (Jan Hoffmann etc.) UNCTAD. October 2017. – URL: http://unctad.org/rmt (дата обращения: 28.04.2018).
Rudjanakanoknad J. Evaluation of International Ports in Thailand through Trade Facilitation Indicies from Freight Forwarders // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. EWGT 2013–16th Meeting of EURO Working Group on Transportaton, 2014. № 111. Pp. 1073–1082.
Sayareh J. A Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Selecting Container Seaport in the Persian Gulf // The Asian journal of shipping and logistics, April 2014. Volume 30, Number 1. Pp. 75–95.
Seo J. The Role of Port Size and Incentives in the Choice of Location by Port Users: A Game-Theoretic Approach // The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, June 2010. Volume 26, Number 1. Pp. 049–066.
Song D.-W. Port governance in Korea: Revisited // Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2017. № 22. Pp. 27–37.
Sugawara J. Port and hinterland network: a case study of the Crescent Corridor intermodal freight program in the US // Transportation Research Procedia, 2017. № 25. Pp. 916–927.
Sutomo H. Assessment Model of the Port Effectiveness and Efficiency (Case Study: Western Indonesia Region) // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences: 8th International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies Changsha, China, August 1–3. 2012. № 43. Pp. 24–32.
The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: Synthesis Report / Edited by Olaf Merk. OECD. – URL: www.oecd.org/regional/portcities. (дата обращения: 28.04.2018).
The Port-city Universities League Secretariat. Yokohama National University. – URL: http://www.pul.ynu.ac.jp (дата обращения: 30.04.2018).
Thomson H. Natural gas as a marine fuel // Energy Policy, 2015. № 87. Pp. 153–167.
Trade and tariff data. WTO Statistics database. WTO. – URL: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/statis_e.htm (дата обращения: 29.04.2018).
Urbanyi-Popiołek I. Container terminals and port city interface – a study of Gdynia and Gdańsk ports // Transportation Research Procedia: 2nd International Conference “Green Cities – Green Logistics for Greener Cities”, Szczecin, Poland, 2016. № 16. Pp. 517–526.
Wiśnicki B. Conditions for developing a port city transport infrastructure illustrated with the example of Szczecin agglomeration // Transportation Research Procedia: 2nd International Conference “Green Cities – Green Logistics for Greener Cities”, 2–3 March 2016. Szczecin, Poland, 2016. № 16. Pp. 566–575.
Woo-chul A. Study on the Securement of the Competitiveness of Gyeong-In Port // The Asian journal of shipping and logistics, August 2014. Volume 30, Number 2. Pp. 243–264.
Xu M. Port Governance in China: Devolution and Effects Analysis // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012. № 43. Pp. 14–23.
Зинченко С. Г. Контроллинг эксплуатации и ремонта объектов транспортно-технологической системы морского порта в условиях дерегуляции перевозки грузов и наличия суброгацийного оборудования. Мариуполь: ООО “ППНС”, 2017.
Ільницький Д. О., Зінченко С. Г. Пошук ідеальної моделі транспортно-технологічної системи порту: компетентнісний вимір // Вісник Одеського національного університету: серія “Економіка”, 2017. Т. 22. Вип. 5 (58). С. 87–97.
Клепиков В. П. Логистическая инфраструктура Азовского морского региона в новых условиях // Логистика и управление цепями поставок, 2016. № 1. С. 69–79.
Кузнецов А. Л. Генезис моделей развития портов в современной транспортной науке // Вестник государственного университета морского и речного флота им. адмирала Макарова, 2015. № 2 (30). С. 141–153.
Муравский А. Военно-торговая логистика: Китай увеличил инвестиции в иностранные порты. – URL: https://ports.com.ua/articles/voenno-torgovaya-logistika-kitay-uvelichil-investitsii-v-inostrannye-porty (дата обращения: 6.08.2018).
Наукометрическая база ScienceDirect. – Режим доступа: www.sciencedirect.com (дата обращения:18.03.2018).
Носков А. Портовая инфраструктура стран Северной Африки и ее влияние на интеграцию в Средиземноморье // Азия и Африка сегодня, 2017. № 5. С. 21–25.
Официальный сайт государственного предприятия “Администрация морских портов Украины” / Раздел “Показатели работы”. – Режим доступа: http://uspa.gov.ua/ru/pokazateli-raboty
Сайт компании “Центр финансово-транспортных стратегий” / Китайские компании за последний год объявили о 20 млрд долл. инвестиций в зарубежные порты / Раздел “Новости”, 9.10.2017. – Режим доступа: https://cfts.org.ua/news/2017/10/09/kitayskie_kompanii_ za_posledniy_god_obyyavili_o_20_mlrd_dollarov_investitsiy_v_zarubezhnye_porty_43348 (дата обращения: 6.08.2018).
Финансовая отчетность. Администрация морских портов Украины. – URL: http://www.uspa.gov.ua/ru/finansovaya-otchetnost (дата обращения: 29.04.2018).
Ambrosino D. Location of mid-range dry ports in multimodal logistic networks // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences: AIRO Winter 2013/2014. № 108. Pp. 118–128.
An in-house university with its sights set on the future // CMA CGM Magazine, Winter 2017/2018. – URL: https://www.cma-cgm.com/media/magazine-article/26/the-experts-cma-cgm-academy-an-in-house-university-with-its-sights-set-on-the-future (дата обращения: 30.04.2018).
Awad-Núñeza S. Application of a model based on the use of DELPHI methodology and Multicriteria Analysis for the assessment of the quality of the Spanish Dry Ports location // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences: XVIII Congreso Panamericano de Ingeniería de Tránsito, Transporte y Logística, 2014. № 162. Pp. 42–50.
Bagočius V. Multi-Criteria Selection of a Deep-Water Port in Klaipeda // Procedia Engineering, 2013. № 57. Pp. 144–148.
Chan S. The Belt and Road Initiative: Implications for China and East Asian Economies // The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 2018, № 35(2). С. 52–78.
Chen S-L. Malaysian Container Seaport-Hinterland Connectivity: Status, Challenges and Strategies // The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2016. № 32 (3). Pp. 127–137.
Chen Yougang, Matzinger Stefan, Woetzel Jonathan. Chinese infrastructure: The big picture. McKinsey Quarterly. June 2013. – URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/winning-in-emerging-markets/chinese-infrastructure-thebig-picture (дата обращения: 30.07.2018).
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report June 30, 2017 and 2016. Port оf Los Angeles. – URL: https://www.portoflosangeles.org/Publications/ Annual_Financial_Report_FY_2016-17.pdf (дата обращения: 30.04.2018).
Container shipping: The next 50 years // Travel, Transport & Logistics, October 2017. – URL: https://www.safety4sea.com/ wp-content/uploads/2017/10/McKinsey-Container-shipping-The-next-50-years-2017_10.pdf (дата обращения: 30.04.2018).
Dong-Jin Kim. A comparison of efficiency with productivity criteria for European container ports // The Asian journal of shipping and logistics, August 2012. Volume 28, Number 2. Pp. 183–202.
Esmer S. A simulation for optimum terminal truck number in a Turkish port based on lean and green concept / Soner Esmer, Ismail Bilge Cetin, Okan Tuna // The Asian journal of shipping and logistics, December 2010. Volume 26, Number 2. Pp. 277–296.
Exports of goods and services. Worldbank Statistics database. World Bank Group. – URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS (дата обращения: 27.04.2018).
Galvao C. B. Public-Private Interests and Conflicts in Ports: A Content Analysis Approach // The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2016. № 32 (1). Pp. 013–022.
Gianfranco F. Port Cooperation Policies in the Mediterranean Basin: an Experimental Approach using Cluster Analysis // Transportation Research Procedia, 2014. № 3. Pp. 700–709.
Gogas M. Assessing the performance of intermodal city logistics terminals in Thessaloniki // Transportation Research Procedia: 3rd Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility, 26–27 May 2016, Volos, Greece. 2017. № 24. Pp. 17–24.
Hamzah S. Private involvement in sustainable management of Indonesian port: Need and strategy with PPP scheme // Procedia Environmental Sciences: 4th International Conference on Sustainable Future for Human Security, 2014. № 20. Pp.187–196.
Hanaoka S. Promoting intermodal freight transport through the development of dry ports in Asia: An environmental perspective // IATSS Research, 2011. № 35. Рp. 16–23.
Jeevan J. Preparation of dry ports for a competitive environment in the container seaport system: A process benchmarking approach // International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 2017. № 7. Pp. 019–033.
Jeon J. W. SNA Approach for Analyzing the Research Trend of International Port Competition // The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2016. № 32 (3). Pp. 165–172.
Lagoudis I. Port Investment Strategies under Uncertainty: The Case of a Southeast Asian Multipurpose Port // The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, December 2014. Volume 30, Number 3. Pp. 299–319.
Li J. Cooperation performance evaluation between seaport and dry port; case of Qingdao port and Xi’an port // International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 2014. № 1. Pp. 99–109.
Libardo A., Parolin A. Multicriteria analysis evaluating Venice port development // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012. № 48. Pp. 2545–2554.
Merchandise: Total trade and share, annual. UNCTAD. – URL: http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=92 (дата обращения: 26.04.2018).
Notteboom T. Port governance in China since 2004: Institutional layering and the growing impact of broader policies // Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2017. № 22. Pp. 184–200.
Olba X. B. Simulating the port wet infrastructure: review and assessment // Transportation Research Procedia: 18th Euro Working Group on Transportation, 2015. № 10. Pp. 683–693.
Ports strategy and logistics challenges: What are the levers for long term vitality? – TDIE Research Council / by Antoine Frémont, Claude Gressier and Pierre Van Cornewal. – URL: http://tdie.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Ports-strategy-andlogistics-challenges-TDIE-report-Oct.-2016.pdf. (дата обращения: 25.04.2018).
Readiness for the Future of Production Report 2018 (Martin C., Aurik J. etc.).
World Economic Forum, 2018. – URL: http://www3.weforum.org/ docs/FOP_Readiness_Report_2018.pdf (дата обращения: 28.04.2018).
Review of Maritime Transport 2017 (Jan Hoffmann etc.) UNCTAD. October 2017. – URL: http://unctad.org/rmt (дата обращения: 28.04.2018).
Rudjanakanoknad J. Evaluation of International Ports in Thailand through Trade Facilitation Indicies from Freight Forwarders // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. EWGT 2013–16th Meeting of EURO Working Group on Transportaton, 2014. № 111. Pp. 1073–1082.
Sayareh J. A Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Selecting Container Seaport in the Persian Gulf // The Asian journal of shipping and logistics, April 2014. Volume 30, Number 1. Pp. 75–95.
Seo J. The Role of Port Size and Incentives in the Choice of Location by Port Users: A Game-Theoretic Approach // The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, June 2010. Volume 26, Number 1. Pp. 049–066.
Song D.-W. Port governance in Korea: Revisited // Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2017. № 22. Pp. 27–37.
Sugawara J. Port and hinterland network: a case study of the Crescent Corridor intermodal freight program in the US // Transportation Research Procedia, 2017. № 25. Pp. 916–927.
Sutomo H. Assessment Model of the Port Effectiveness and Efficiency (Case Study: Western Indonesia Region) // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences: 8th International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies Changsha, China, August 1–3. 2012. № 43. Pp. 24–32.
The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: Synthesis Report / Edited by Olaf Merk. OECD. – URL: www.oecd.org/regional/portcities. (дата обращения: 28.04.2018).
The Port-city Universities League Secretariat. Yokohama National University. – URL: http://www.pul.ynu.ac.jp (дата обращения: 30.04.2018).
Thomson H. Natural gas as a marine fuel // Energy Policy, 2015. № 87. Pp. 153–167.
Trade and tariff data. WTO Statistics database. WTO. – URL: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/statis_e.htm (дата обращения: 29.04.2018).
Urbanyi-Popiołek I. Container terminals and port city interface – a study of Gdynia and Gdańsk ports // Transportation Research Procedia: 2nd International Conference “Green Cities – Green Logistics for Greener Cities”, Szczecin, Poland, 2016. № 16. Pp. 517–526.
Wiśnicki B. Conditions for developing a port city transport infrastructure illustrated with the example of Szczecin agglomeration // Transportation Research Procedia: 2nd International Conference “Green Cities – Green Logistics for Greener Cities”, 2–3 March 2016. Szczecin, Poland, 2016. № 16. Pp. 566–575.
Woo-chul A. Study on the Securement of the Competitiveness of Gyeong-In Port // The Asian journal of shipping and logistics, August 2014. Volume 30, Number 2. Pp. 243–264.
Xu M. Port Governance in China: Devolution and Effects Analysis // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012. № 43. Pp. 14–23.