KOAN AS A MEDIATED TOOL FOR THE INEFFABLE EXPERIENCE: THE MIDDLE POSITION IN APPROACHING CHINESE CHAN TEACHING
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Rather than arguing for the role of language in transmitting the ineffable experience, the article reframes the debate by discussing Chan (Zen) experience as mediated via expedient means. Chinese Chan teaching is not out of the “spell of languages.” Nevertheless, the article discusses that neither clinging to language nor entirely disregarding its role in Chan teaching is the ideal approach to understanding the ineffable Chan experience. More precisely, the article attempts to approach the unspeakable Chan experience based on the theory of “twofold truth”: truth relating to the conventional and truth in terms of the ultimate. Therefore, one plausible route in response to the paradoxical relationship between Chan experience and various ways of mediation in Chan teaching is to seek an answer in Nāgārjuna’ s exposition of “the middle position.” First, the author presents a linguistic interpretation of Chan experience and explicates the connection between the koan teaching and Chan enlightenment. Although there is a well-known Chan statement of “teaching beyond words and letters” (不立文 字), it is important to note that Chan koan is a form of writing via words and letters. The linguistic nature of koans serves to provoke “great doubt” (疑情) in Chan students under specific circumstances. However, if we consider the significance of koan solely in terms of its language, we will fail to capture the essence o f the koan tradition. Second, the research critically examines the study of Chinese Chan koans, spanning from a pragmatic dimension to a contextual one. The author argues that it might be misleading to close the gap between linguistic context and experiential one. Sufficient examples in Chinese Chan Buddhist teachings demonstrate that disciples’ enlightenment can be triggered not only by linguistic expressions but also by external stimuli. Then, it is important to make reference to other overriding mediated tools in Chan practice, such as somatic intentions, “discipleship,” and semiotic tools. Since Chan experience is mediated, whether transmitted with words or not, a teaching with other skillful means (upaya) should be explored. Lastly, the author concludes the paper by contending that a middle-way perspective may help us better understand Chan experience without falling into the extremes of linguistic determinism or mysticism. This middle–way approach essentially resonates with Dōgen’s “oneness of practice and realization,” which highlights the reconciliation of the doctrine of Buddha-nature with the imperative of practice.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Chinese Chan teaching, Chan experience, koans, the middle position, linguistic understanding
Cleary T., Cleary J. The Blue Cliff Record. Boulder : Shambhala, 1977.
Dao Companion to Chinese Buddhist Philosophy / ed. by Y. Wang, S. Wawrytko. Dordrecht : Springer Verlag, 2017.
Davis W. A. Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Garfield J. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna's mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Grice H. P. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics / ed. by P. Cole, JL. Morgan. New York, 1975. P. 41–58.
Heine S., Wright D. S. The koan: Texts and Contexts in Zen Buddhism. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2000.
Jia J. Classical Chan Buddhism: A New Study of Chan Development from Mid-Tang Dynasty to Five Dynasties. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2010.
Karunadasa Y. Early Buddhist Teachings: The middle Position in Theory and Practice. Hong Kong : Centre of Buddhist Studies, University of Hong Kong, 2014.
Katz S.T. Mysticism and Language. New York : Oxford University Press, 1992.
Katz S. T. Language, epistemology, and mysticism. Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis / ed. by S. T. Katz. Oxford, 1978.
logico-philosophicus. New York : Oxford University Press, 2006.
McManus D. The Enchantment of Words: Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Murti T. The Central Philosophy of Buddhism. London : George Allen and Unwin, 1955.
Nagatomo S. A critique of Steven Katz’s contextualism: an Asian perspective. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy. 2002. No. 1. P. 185–207.
Nelson E. Book review: opening a mountain: kōans of the Zen masters. Buddhist-Christian Studies. 2004. No. 24. P. 284–288.
Poceski M. Ordinary Mind as the Way: The Hongzhou School and the Growth of Chan Buddhism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Robinson D. Performative Linguistics: Speaking and Translating as Doing Things with Words. London : Routledge, 2003.
Rosemont H. The meaning is the use: koan and mondo as linguistic tools of the Zen masters. Philosophy East and West. 1970. No. 20. P. 109–119.
Siderits M. Nāgārjuna’s Middle Way: Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Boston : Wisdom Publications, 2013.
Suzuki D. T. Zen: A reply to Hu Shih. Philosophy East and West. No. 3. P. 25–46.
Waddell N., Abe M. Heart of Dōgen’s Shōbōgenzō. Albany : State University of New York Press, 2002.
Wu A. Rendering the unsayable: unnatural acts of narration in koan literature. Neohelicon. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-022-00652-y.
Yampolsky P. The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch. Columbia : Columbia University Press, 1978.
Zhang E. Y. Negative certainties: Nāgārjuna’s challenge to Kant on the “togetherness of intuition and concepts. Intuition: Kant and Asian Philosophy / ed. by S. Palmquist. New York/London, 2018a. P. 122–137.
Zhang E. Y. Jizang’s negation in the four levels of twofold truth. Dao Companion to Chinese Buddhist Philosophy / ed. by Y. Wang, S. Wawrytko. Dordrecht, 2018b. P. 188–216.
圜悟克勤. 碧巖錄. 北京 : 東方出版社, 2018.
無門慧開. 禪宗無門關. 北京 : 東方出版社, 2017.