FORMATION OF THE SEMANTICAL FIELD OF EXISTENT-DYNAMIC CONCEPTS OF THE I CHING ON THE EXAMPLE OF OPPOSITIONAL AND ODD TERMS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The historical experience and rich cultural heritage of the pre-axial Chinese civilization are concentrated and reflected in the classical Chinese language. Therefore, linguistic methods of research of traditional Chinese philosophy and its frames become relevant in the modern Sinology. Taking into account the material of Chinese Classics it is possible to reconstruct the conceptual apparatus of traditional Chinese philosophy and culture in general, and some of the Classics in particular. Among the sets of fundamental terms, it is worth highlighting the compendiums by Chan Wing-tsit, Joseph Needham, Artem Kobzev, Wu Yi and Artemiy Karapetyants, which formed the basis of this study. The object of the study is ontological-dynamic concepts, and the purpose – to develop a model of their linguo-cultutral analysis. The statistical analysis of conceptions of the I Ching tradition, namely Xici Zhuan or “The Appended Commentaries”, helps to construct a monocentric semantic field of ontological terms with a heterogeneous core. This model of linguo-cultural analysis proves to be universal for the many philosophical concepts. The model includes the term in different scripts (traditional and modern characters), transcription, quantity in the Appended Commentaries, its number according to the lists of fundamental terms, grammatological commentary and the interpretation in the different Chinese philosophical traditions, namely Confucianism, Daoism and Buddhism. In this study the model is demonstrated on the examples of oppositional (动 dong ‘motion’, 地 di ‘Earth’) and singular terms (德 de ‘virtue, power, property, mana’, 故 gu ‘cause, reason, fact’). The results of the study show that the reconstruction of the conceptual frames of Xici Zhuan gives a key to deep linguistic analysis of core philosophical terms.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
China, Chinese language, linguoculturology, semantic field, compendiums of traditional Chinese philosophy and culture, ontological-dynamic concepts, Appended Commentaries
И цзин (Канон перемен) / Пер. и примеч. А. Е. Лукьянова. Москва: ИПЦ “Маска”; Чэнду: Сычуань жэньминь чубаньшэ, 2018.
Карапетьянц А. М. Раннекитайская системология. Москва: Издательская фирма Восточная литература, 2015.
Wright D. Tan Sitong and the Ether Reconsidered. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 1994. T. 57.
Wu Yi. Chinese philosophical terms. University Press of America, 1986.
Xu Shen. Showen Jiezi (Eastern Han). Shenyang: Liaohai chubanshe, 2014.
太极图说全文及译文. URL: https://www.process-safety-lab.com/archives/2263.html (accessed 25.05.2020)
儒学经典名著:周敦颐 “通书” 原文. URL: http://www.360doc.com/content/18/0603/05/33540468_759225095.shtml (accessed 13.09.2020)
哲学大辞典 (中国哲学史卷). 上海:上海辞书出版社,1985. 821页.
说文解字 / (东汉)许慎编. – 沈阳:辽海出版社,2014.12辞海. 第六版普及本 (三全册). 上海:上海辞书出版社,2010.