ROOF PLASTIC ART IN THE MICROCOSM OF A TRADITIONAL CHINESE HOUSE AND THE MACROCOSM OF A CITY

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  K. Rakhno

Abstract

The article deals with the general role and place of roofing plastic in the microcosm of a traditional Chinese house. The tiled roof was the most original, noticeable and recognizable element of the Chinese architecture. In the late Middle Ages, the rank of buildings in the administrative hierarchy was shown by the design of the roof. The history of tile production in China is going back to the ancient times. Art critics have long noted that the most striking features in Chinese buildings are the roofs and gables, with their fantastic clay creatures sitting in a line on the ridges and hips of the roof. Only the roof could act as a protection between the threatening forces of nature and a man. Because the role of the roof was so important, the Chinese did not limit themselves to its technical design, but also strengthened it with spiritual amulets, exposing the main contingent of his animistically formed “defense army” in the form of clay figurines built along the gables and ridges of a roof. They had to stand there as constantly ready, never tired guards. Only then does the Chinese feel protected from the attacks of evil demons. Thus arose the widespread use of roofing figurines, and, thanks to the constancy of the Chinese worldview, this application has taken place over the centuries until our time. Chinese builders tried to use favorable spiritual forces and scare away evil influences with means of everyday decoration, which had a symbolic meaning. Therefore, tiles were the most common apotropaic agents on roofs. According to ethnographic data, roofing clay sculptures in traditional Chinese society were entrusted with very specific functions of manifesting the social status of the building, protecting it from evil and constructing a happy existence in it, based on ancient cosmological ideas. The aesthetic component was, in fact, secondary. Instead, the location of ceramic figures, which were attached to the most vulnerable in terms of mythological consciousness of the roof, their color, number, order and character composition were important first of all.

How to Cite

Rakhno, K. (2021). ROOF PLASTIC ART IN THE MICROCOSM OF A TRADITIONAL CHINESE HOUSE AND THE MACROCOSM OF A CITY. Chinese Studies, (3), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.51198/chinesest2021.03.007
Article views: 137 | PDF Downloads: 72

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

roof, tile, roofing ceramics, clay figurines, mascots, Forbidden City, China

References
Baker W.T. (2008), Architectural Excellence in a Diverse World Culture, Images Publishing Pty Ltd., Victoria. (In English).
Barmé G. (2008), The Forbidden City, Profile Books Ltd., London. (In English).
Bates R. (2008), 29 Chinese Mysteries, TuDragons Books Ltd., Beijing. (In English).
Becker J. (2008), City of Heavenly Tranquility: Beijing in the History of China, Oxford University Press. (In English).
Chan C. (1992), Imperial China, Chronicle Books, San Francisco: XII, 164 p. (In English).
Chunfeng Y., Yi W. (2004), “The Colourful Glazed Forbidden City,” China and the World Cultural Exchange, No. 6, pp. 10–12. (In English).
Eberhard W. (1986), Dictionary of Chinese Symbols: Hidden Symbols in Chinese Life and Thought, Routledge, London and New York. (In English).
Fuchs E. (1924), Dachreiter und verwandte chinesische Keramik des XV. bis XVIII. Jahrhunderts, Albert Langen, München. (in German)
Gao J. (2016), “The Architectural Symbolism of Chinese Imperial Power: The Magnificent Design, Distinct Colors and Lucky Numbers of the Forbidden City,” Education About Asia, vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 9–17. (In English).
Gaubatz P.R. (1996), Beyond the Great Wall: Urban Form and Transformation on the Chinese Frontiers, Stanford University Press, Stanford. (In English).
Kerr R, Wood N. (2004), Science and Civilisation in China, vol. 5/12, Ceramic Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (In English).
Knapp R.G. (2000), China’s Old Dwellings, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. (In English).
Laufer B. (1910) “Zur kulturhistorischen Stellung der chinesischen Provinz Shansi”, Anthropos, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 181–203. (in German).
Lillehoj E. (1983), Chinese Ceramics. Catalog by Illinois State Museum, Springfield. November 13, 1983 – January 15, 1984, Printed by the authority of the State of Illinois, Springfield. (In English).
Lindqvist C. (2009), China: Empire of Living Symbols, Da Capo Press, Cambridge. (In English).
Little S., Eichman Sh. (2000), Taoism and the Arts of China, The Art Institute of Chicago; University of California Press, Chicago. (In English).
Meyer J. F. (1991), The Dragons of Tiananmen: Beijing as a Sacral City, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia. (In English).
Osterloh-Gessat E. (1990), “Dieser Ziegel ist mir lieb und wer ihn stihlt der ist eir dieb”, “Von erd bin ich gemacht”. Gestaltete Baukeramik: Ofenwandplättchen und Feierabendziegel, INFO Verlagsgesellschalt, Karlsruhe, pp. 33–127. (in German).
Peesch R. (1981), Ornamentik der Volkskunst in Europa, Druckerei Fortschritt Erfurt, Lepzig. (in German)
Peyrefitte A. (1992), The Immobile Empire, Vintage Books. A Division of Random House, Inc., New York. (In English).
Qingxi L. (2001), The Architectural Art of Ancient China, China Intercontinental Press, Beijing. (In English).
Staunton G. (1799), An Authentic Account of an Embassy from the King of Great Britain to the Emperor of China; Including Cursory Observations Made, and Information Obtained, in Travelling through that Ancient Empire and a Small Part of Chinese Tartary. Together with a Relation of the Voyage Undertaken on the Occasion of His Majesty’s ship the Lion, and the ship Hindostan, in the East India Company’s Service, to the Yellow Sea and Gulf of Pekin, as Well as of Their Return to Europe; Taken Chiefly from the Papers of His Excellency the Earl of Macartney, Sir Erasmus Gower, and of Other Gentlemen in the Several Departments of the Embassy, vol. 1, printed for Robert Campbell, by John Bioren, Philadelphia. (In English).
Stumfohl H. (1991), Die rote Farbe in Religion und Ritus, besonders in vorgeschichtlicher Hinsicht. Almogaren, No. 21, pp. 143–164. (in German)
Tan S. (2007), Craftworks of China, China Intercontinental Press, Beijing. (In English).
Vainker S.J. (1995), Chinese Pottery and Porcelain: From Prehistory to the Present, British Museum Press, London. (In English).
Valenstein S.G. (1989), A Handbook of Chinese Ceramics, The Metropolitan Museum of Art; Weidenfeld and Nicolson, New York and London. (In English).
Wang A. (2000), Cosmology and Political Culture in Early China, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (In English).
Watson W. (1984), Tang and Liao Ceramics, Thames and Hudson, London. (In English).
Williams Ch.A.S. (1974), Chinese Symbolism and Art Motifs: An Alphabetical Compendium of Antique, Turtle Publishing, Boston. (In English).
Williamson A. (1870), Journeys in North China, Manchuria, and Eastern Mongolia: With Some Account of Corea. In two volumes, vol. II, Smith, Elder and Co., London. (In English).