CHINA’S CRISIS COMMUNICATION DURING THE PRIMAL PERIOD OF COVID-19 EPIDEMIC

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Ye. Hobova

Abstract

Coronavirus epidemic that started in late 2019 in Wuhan, became an unprecedented challenge for the Chinese healthcare system and Chinese diplomacy. The paper analyses the measures and claims made by official China from the point of the crisis communication theory. Crisis management strategies and actions in the public infosphere of China during the initial stage of new coronavirus pneumonia spread within the country. Using the written texts of MFA of PRC press conferences and news messages in the key official information agencies, the main narratives of internal and external communication are examined. The analysis highlights flaws on the stage of initial response to the crisis – untimely reaction, uncoordinated measures, lack of empathic messages. All of that may lead to complications in reputation repair and further increase of China’s reputational burden in the context of healthcare crises. Content of the narratives found in the material, despite the shortcomings in the communication of Wuhan epidemic, shows the current trends in Chinese foreign relations. Proactive formation of a “responsible great state” image is one of the most prominent traits in the MFA speakers’ rhetoric. Internal crisis communication had consistent promotion of information on personal safety measures and hygiene recommendations for the epidemic. Such a strategy combined with the general narrative of “people’s battle with the disease” helped at least in part to reduce panic within the society. Epidemic in the foreign media also became a part of the general epidemic discourse in the Chinese traditional media. References to current foreign relations concepts, accurate action coordination with the Chinese information agencies, in particular, showed overall preparedness of the country’s official representatives to this kind of situation. In general, taking into account the discovered shortcomings, the stage of initial response to the crisis exhibited satisfactory actions of corresponding institutions and efficiency of international relations concepts that were guiding these actions.

How to Cite

Hobova, Y. (2021). CHINA’S CRISIS COMMUNICATION DURING THE PRIMAL PERIOD OF COVID-19 EPIDEMIC. Chinese Studies, (1), 5-16. Retrieved from https://chinese-studies.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/61
Article views: 150 | PDF Downloads: 79

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

crisis communication, COVID-19, China, foreign affairs, narrative

References
Benoit, W. L. Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration. Albany, 1995.
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E. et al. The COVID-19 Social Media Infodemic. URL: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200305004C/abstract
Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S. J. Halo or reputational capital: Reputation and crisis management // Journal of Communication Management, 2006, 10(2).
Coombs, W. T. Impact of past crises on current crisis communications: Insights from situational crisis communication theory // Journal of Business Communication, 2004, 41.
Coombs, W. T. Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, Managing, and responding (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, 2007.
Gao Xiangze. Responsibility Theory: Necessary Resort of the Ethics of Contemporary Society // Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology, 2007.
Stojanovic, D. China’s ‘mask diplomacy’ wins support in Eastern Europe. URL: https://apnews.com/76dff4b113e82d85716262895909f151
Triwibowo, A. Diplomacy and COVID-19: a reflection. URL: http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/JurnalIlmiahHubunganInternasiona/article/view/3861/2906
Verma, R. China’s ‘mask diplomacy’ to change the COVID-19 narrative in Europe // Asia Europe Journal, 2020, 1–5.
2020年1月23日外交部发言人耿爽主持例行记者会 URL: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/wjdt_674879/fyrbt_674889/t1735570.shtml
2020年2月3日外交部发言人华春莹主持网上例行记者会. URL: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/wjdt_674879/fyrbt_674889/t1739521.shtml
2020年3月12日外交部发言人耿爽主持例行记者会. URL: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/wjdt_674879/fyrbt_674889/t1755063.shtml
杜成敏. 傲慢与偏见比病毒更毒 // LEIFENG , 2020, 5月号, 84–88页.
韩丹丹. 抗击疫情 – 彰显中国力量 // 大庆社会科学, 2002, 第2期, 30–33页。
韩瑞波, 王娅茹. 公共危机管理研究进展与疫情下的实践导向 // 学习论坛, 2020年, 6月, 第6期, 62–70页。
何良。提升新时代中国国际话语权. URL: http://www.qstheory.cn/dukan/hqwg/2019-09/09/c_1124968280.htm
胡睿。疫情防治中社区责任的国际经验借鉴 // 北京城市学院学报, 2020, 第二期, 1–4页。
罗叶丹。疫情防控国际话语权的理论思考 // 人民论坛, 2020, 4月-5月合并出版, 146–147页。
门洪华。构建新型国际关系:中国的责任与担当 // 世界经济与政治, 2016, 第三期, 4–25页。
欧阳辉。习近平向世界讲好中国故事的思想. URL: http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0222/c40531-30897581.html
乔新生。重大疫情与西方媒体的报道 // 青年记者, 2020, 4月下, 109 页。
孙吉胜。 理论、机制、能力:加强中国外交研究的思考 // 太平洋学报, 2020, 第5期, 1–13页。
万鹏。习近平提出“人类命运共同体”重大意义之三:中国贡献繁荣全世界。URL: http://cpc.people.com.cn/xuexi/n1/2018/0126/c385474-29787976.html
王义桅。做好疫情公共外交,构建人类命运共同体 // 公共外交季刊, 2020, 第1期, 17–27页。
王义桅。中国展现负责人大国形象 // 人民论坛, 2020, 4月–5月合并出版, 36–39页。
王仲昀。疫情新常态下的“有效预防”与“国际合作” // 新民周刊, 2020, 第1090期, 50–51页。
习近平。大国意味着更大责任, 而份额更大垄断. URL: http://world.people.com.cn/n/2015/0328/c157278-26764197.html
习近平。彰显中国负责任大国担当:国际人士热议习近平主席新年贺词 // 人民日报, 2019, 1月2日。
贤集网。武汉肺炎会传染:患者已转入金银潭医院 八问武汉病毒性肺炎. URL: https://www.xianjichina.com/special/detail_438105.html
闫岩, 温婧。新冠疫情早期的媒介使用、风险感知与个体行为 // 新闻界, 2020, 第六期, 50–61页。
叶皓。公共外交与国际传播 // 现代传播, 2012, 第6期, 11–19页。
叶小文。防止中华民族复兴进程中的颠覆性风险 // 开放导报, 2020, 第3期, 7–13 页。
郑燕芳。话语生态传播视角下城乡“防疫”宣传语研究 // 传媒观察, 2020, 第六期, 33–40页。
中国战 “疫”:八个关键词背后的法理依据. URL: http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2020/01-30/9073283.shtml